- Shortlysts
- Posts
- Trump vs. Chicago: The Sanctuary City War Begins
Trump vs. Chicago: The Sanctuary City War Begins
Trump's lawsuit against Chicago challenges its sanctuary policies, arguing they obstruct federal immigration enforcement. The case could reshape national immigration policy and funding for sanctuary cities.

What Happened
The Trump administration has launched its first legal battle against the city of Chicago, Cook County, and the state of Illinois.
This is likely the first of several lawsuits against sanctuary cities.
The administration has claimed that their sanctuary policies obstruct federal immigration policies and enforcement.
Why it Matters
The lawsuit, filed in federal court, takes direct aim at Illinois' Trust Act and Chicago’s Welcoming City ordinance. Both policies limit local cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
This is the latest move in Trump’s promise to crackdown on sanctuary cities. That’s a term used for jurisdictions that refuse to assist federal immigration authorities in detaining or deporting illegal immigrants.
The administration argues these policies create public safety risks and undermine national security. Attorney General Pam Bondi, leading the charge, made it clear this is only the beginning. She vowed that similar lawsuits against other sanctuary jurisdictions across the country are coming.
The big question is whether cities and states have the right to defy federal immigration law. The Trump administration argues that sanctuary laws prevent ICE from doing its job, allowing dangerous criminals to remain in the country. However, Chicago policymakers have argued that their policies protect immigrants, encourage trust in law enforcement, and prevent racial profiling.
But the data tells a more complex story. According to the Center for Immigration Studies, which supports stricter immigration policies, 69% of ICE arrests in 2023 involved individuals with prior criminal records. The administration argues that sanctuary policies make it much harder to detain these offenders before they re-offend.
On the other hand, a study from the Cato Institute suggests that immigrants — both legal and illegal — commit crimes at lower rates than native-born Americans. But many still feel that even a lower crime rate doesn't justify shielding anyone who breaks the law.
In addition to crime, there’s a financial burden. A report from the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) estimated that illegal immigration costs U.S. taxpayers $151 billion annually. Illinois alone spends over $4.6 billion on healthcare, education, and other services for undocumented immigrants. Trump’s lawsuit taps into this economic angle, arguing that states like Illinois are forcing federal taxpayers to subsidize their refusal to enforce immigration laws.
For residents of Chicago and other sanctuary cities, this lawsuit may signal a shift in how local governments handle immigration enforcement. If Trump wins the lawsuit, cities may be forced to cooperate with ICE or risk losing federal funding.
That funding cut would drastically affect police budgets, social programs, and infrastructure projects. The lawsuit could serve as a precedent for challenging other progressive state policies that conflict with federal law, from gun control measures to environmental regulations.
For immigrants — especially those in the country illegally — this lawsuit raises the stakes. If sanctuary protections weaken, deportation efforts could ramp up in places where ICE has previously been restricted. Some fear this could deter even legal immigrants from reporting crimes or seeking medical car. However, many argue that enforcing immigration laws is simply a matter of maintaining national sovereignty.
How it Affects You
Trump has long made immigration enforcement one of his signature issues. His administration has vowed to reinstate and expand policies like Remain in Mexico and Title 42, while taking even harsher action against sanctuary cities.
Beyond Illinois, other states and cities could soon face similar lawsuits. California, New York, and Denver all have strong sanctuary policies, and Trump has signaled that his administration is ready to challenge them in court. His strategy is clear: force these cities to comply with federal immigration enforcement or face the financial consequences.
With billions of dollars, public safety, and national immigration policy at stake, the new lawsuit could substantially alter how cities across America handle illegal immigration. Whether Trump’s lawsuit against Chicago succeeds or not, one thing is certain: the sanctuary city fight is just heating up.